Blog

The Temporary Universe

(excerpted from my essay in Tin House magazine, March 2012)

Last August my oldest daughter got married. The ceremony took place at a farm in the little town of Wells, in Maine, against the backdrop of rolling green meadows, a white wooden barn, and the sounds of a classical guitar. Each member of the wedding party stepped down a sloping hill towards the chuppah, while the guests sat in simple white chairs bordered by rows of sunflowers. The air was redolent with the smells of maples and grasses and other growing things. It was a marriage we had all hoped for. The two families had known each other with affection for years. Radiant in her white dress, a white dahlia in her hair, my daughter asked to hold my hand as we walked down the aisle.

 

It was a perfect picture of utter joy, and utter tragedy. Because I wanted my daughter back as she was at age ten, or twenty. As we moved together towards that lovely arch that would swallow us all, other scenes flashed through my mind: my daughter in first grade holding a starfish as big as herself, her smile missing a tooth; my daughter on the back of my bicycle as we rode to a river to drop stones in the water; my daughter telling me the day after she had her first period. Now, she was thirty. I could see lines in her face.

 

I don’t know why we long so for permanence, why the fleeting nature of things so disturbs. With futility, we cling to the old wallet long after it has fallen apart. We visit and revisit the old neighborhood where we grew up, searching for the remembered grove of trees and the little fence. We clutch our old photographs. In our churches and synagogues and mosques, we pray to the everlasting and eternal. Yet, in every nook and cranny, nature screams at the top of her lungs that nothing lasts, that it is all passing away. All that we see around us, including our own bodies, is shifting and evaporating and one day will be gone. Where are the one billion people who lived and breathed in the year 1800, only two short centuries ago?

 

The evidence seems overly clear. In the summer months, mayflies drop by the billions within 24 hours of birth. Drone ants perish in two weeks. Daylilies bloom and then wilt, leaving dead, papery stalks. Forests burn down, replenish themselves, then disappear again. Ancient stone temples and spires flake in the salty air, fracture and fragment, dwindle to spindly nubs, and eventually dissolve into nothing. Coastlines erode and crumble. Glaciers slowly but surely grind down the land. Once, the continents were joined. Once the air was ammonia and methane. Now it is oxygen and nitrogen. In the future, it will be something else. The sun is depleting its nuclear fuel. And just look at our own bodies. In the middle years and beyond, skin sags and cracks. Eyesight fades. Hearing diminishes. Bones shrink and turn brittle.

 

Just the other day, I had to retire my favorite shoes, a pair of copper colored wing tips that I purchased thirty years ago to wear at a friend’s graduation. For the first few years, all I had to do to keep the shoes looking spiffy was to polish them. Then, the soles began to wear down. Every couple of years, I would take my wing tips to a small shoe repair shop I knew and have new soles installed. The shop was run by three generations of an Italian family. In the early years, the grandfather worked on my shoes. Then he died and his son took over the job. The resoling kept my shoes going another twenty years. My wife begged me to surrender. But I loved those shoes. They reminded me of me in my salad days. Eventually, the upper leather of the shoes became so thin that it cracked and split. I took the shoes back to the shop. The cobbler looked at them, shook his head, and smiled.

 

Physicists call it the Second Law of Thermodynamics. It is also called the arrow of time. Oblivious to our human yearnings for permanence, the universe is relentlessly wearing down, falling apart, driving itself towards a condition of maximum disorder. It is a question of probabilities. You start from a situation of improbable order, like a deck of cards all arranged according to number and suit, or like a solar system with several planets orbiting nicely about a central star. Then you drop the deck of cards on the floor over and over again. You let other stars randomly whiz by your solar system, jostling it with their gravity. The cards become jumbled. The planets get picked off and go aimlessly wandering through space. Order has yielded to disorder. Repeated patterns to change. In the end, you cannot defeat the odds. You might beat the house for a while, but the universe has an infinite supply of time and can outlast any player.

Comments Off | View full entry

Galileo for a Day

January is the month that Galileo made his most monumental discovery: spotting the four moons of Jupiter through his twenty-power spyglass.

Representatives of Instituto e Museo Nazionale di Storia della Scienza in Florence, Italy place the Galileo telescope into the display at the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania April 1, 2009.

It reminds me of a visit I made three years ago to the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia, when they had one of Galileo’s telescopes on display.

It looked rather mundane, like an extra-long paper-towel tube: a blotchy brown cylinder about three feet long and two inches wide made out of wood and varnished paper, all held together by rings of metal wire.  This instrument is one of only two still in existence made by Galileo.

Scheduled to give an evening lecture, I was fortunate to be at the Institute during the exhibit. Arriving early, I had time to peruse the Galileo exhibition and to my delight found the rooms, filled with astronomical artifacts from the Renaissance, deserted. Walking by the astrolabes, compasses, and quadrants, I turned a corner, and there it was: Galileo’s telescope, perched at an angle on two transparent rods. It was enclosed in a tall glass case, standing solitary and majestic on the polished wooden floor. I was alone with one of the greatest artifacts in astronomical history.

Despite the instrument’s plain appearance, it took my breath away. No one is sure what discoveries Galileo made with this specific telescope (he constructed many), but the aura of fame still surrounds it. I was able to kneel down to position my eye within an inch of the eyepiece, separated only by the glass case. Peering down the tube, which holds Galileo’s original lenses, I saw a blurry white spot. Alas, just the museum ceiling. But in my imagination, I was sighting the phases of Venus, mountains on the Moon, and Jupiter’s satellites for the very first time, just as Galileo did four hundred years earlier.

Comments Off | View full entry

A Plea

Please make sure your name is on every page of everything you upload. That includes your writing samples and supplemental essay.

Thanks!

Comments Off | View full entry

Transcripts

We’ve had more questions about admission!

Today’s was about transcripts – do we accept electronic transcripts, and who should receive them? And what’s our cut-off GPA for admission?

The answer to the first and second is absolutely, we accept electronic transcripts! We love them. You may have them sent to the Academic Administrator, Shannon Larkin at her email address slarkin@mit.edu.

The answer to the second is that we don’t have cutoffs. Nor does our admissions committee pay much attention to GPA – they look at all the individual grades.

Keep these questions coming.

Comments Off | View full entry

Writing Samples

Ah, admissions. One of my favorite times of year. All the hopeful, serious, energetic prospective students trying to decide if science writing is for them. And once they’ve come to that conclusion, craft their applications.

Today’s topic will hopefully give some direction to those applicants. Our application instructions are quite vague when it comes to writing samples. We don’t tell you how many pages, or words. We don’t even tell you what type. Only “arranged as you choose, that represent your writing at its best.”

Frustrating, isn’t it? To be given so much freedom?

But think about it – some of our applicants come from the sciences, where they’ve written primarily lab reports. Some come from English or Journalism backgrounds. Some have written for newspapers, some have not. Some have lots of samples to choose from, some have none.  So we’ve tried to make our application flexible enough to meet all needs.

When choosing your writing samples try to remember a few basic things.

1. Consider your audience. The admissions committee will be reading over fifty very wordy applications.  They’re trying to divine from this jumble of numbers, verbs, nouns, and modifiers who will get the most out of our program. Ensure that your samples will demonstrate that. Don’t try to make them go blind reading a one hundred page thesis on Jane Eyre when a perfectly good page on photosynthesis will do.

2. It’s okay to write something new, specifically for the application. Are you someone newly out of college? A scientist surrendering to a love of writing? Don’t have any published “clips” to submit? Take a scientific paper, lab report, or press release, and craft a news story or essay out of it. Write something as if it were to be published in your favorite science magazine. Just say so on the cover page.

3. Fiction is okay, but make sure it’s not the bulk of your sample. Fiction doesn’t tell the committee much about your ability to tackle technical and scientific concepts, but it might demonstrate your flair for narrative.

4. You may submit audio and video samples.  They should be accompanied by transcripts, if possible.  The current application does not have the capability to upload these, they’ll have to be sent separately to sciwrite-www@mit.edu.

I hope these suggestions help – please feel free ask more questions in the comments.

View all Comments | View full entry

Astrobites

A common refrain from my science-writing students is, “Where do you get story ideas?”

A good place to start is hanging out with graduate students and post-docs, who are often thinking and working on problems at the cutting edge.  Many of my best magazine articles when I was starting out involved the work of these pioneering newcomers (many of whom are now the leading lights in their fields).

If those interested in writing on astronomy can’t make a personal university visit to find out what’s on a graduate student’s mind these days, there’s a new website that offers the next best thing: Called “astrobites,” it’s a daily astrophysical literature journal written by graduate students for undergraduates.  It beautifully fulfills its named mission―providing up-to-date summaries of the latest research in easy-to-go-down write-ups.  The graduate students who post these reports―from Harvard, Berkeley, Oxford, Yale, Michigan, UC Santa Cruz, Colorado, Arizona, among others―aim to make active research areas enticing and accessible to undergraduates, but it serves just as well as a convenient overview for journalists seeking hot new topics popping up in the field of astronomy and astrophysics.

Comments Off | View full entry

The Weight of GREs

The hustle and bustle of the students arriving on campus is only equaled by the hustle of the prospective students chafing to get their applications done.  And since a couple of questions come up every year, I thought I’d start a series of blog posts dealing with them.

The most frequent question I get during admissions season is “what’s the minimum GRE score for admission to your program?”

Stressed out test-taker

I'll never score high enough for MIT!

I am asked this so frequently that I should have a pat answer to the question, but I don’t.    We don’t track GREs, and we don’t use them as a cutoff.  So I honestly can’t recommend an ideal GRE score.

We require the GRE general test as part of the application, and the admissions committee does consider it.  But the GRE is a small part of the entire picture of you that the application paints.  If a GRE score is low, it could mean that the applicant doesn’t have what it takes to be successful in our program.  But it could also mean that they don’t test well in that format.  Or that they’ve been out of school for a while. Or that they had gastroenteritis that day.

So if the admissions committee sees a low-to-middling GRE score, they’ll look at other bits of the application a little harder, trying to get a better picture of the applicant.  How does the transcript look?  Not the GPA – but the individual coursework.  What classes did you take, and how did you do?  If you struggled in Physics I, did you improve in Physics II? Did you get all As despite your low GRE score?  Were you in an honors program?  What do your recommenders say about your work habits?

And then there’s the writing samples.  If you’re going to worry about any part of the application, worry about these.  This is, after all, a writing program.  Show the committee what you’re made of in your writing.  Tackle some gnarly scientific concepts, or big ideas.  Show us who you are – that’s what the GREs can’t tell us.

man writing

It's all about the writing

I hope this helps to explain why I won’t give you a straight answer on a “good” GRE score, and help you sort out your application.  Let the discussion begin!

Comments Off | View full entry

Summer time is slow time

There’s a rare bit of down time in the Graduate Program in the summertime. The students are all out at their internships – Technology Review, Discover Magazine, Living on Earth Radio, National Institutes of Health, Brookhaven National Lab, International Center of Theoretical Physics. The faculty are busily working on either their own projects or preparing for the fall semester. The new class isn’t here yet. Admissions will open in September for prospective students.

Although it’s not a great time to visit MIT to meet faculty or students, the campus is lovely at this time of year. A few art projects remain from the FAST arts festival to be admired, the trees are all leafed out, and the Charles river teems with sailboats. And although the buzzing energy of MIT never stops, its hum is slightly reduced in the summer as people occasionally look up from their monitors and petri dishes.

It’s a great time to ask admissions questions, though, while we all have time to give thoughtful, rather than blunt, responses.

Comments Off | View full entry

Time for Launch

Welcome to the latest version of our website, up and running just in time for the celebration of the 10th anniversary of our program’s founding.  We’ve taken special care in making the site more inviting and accessible, especially to prospective students who are interested in learning more about the MIT Graduate Program in Science Writing and what we have to offer.  With a click on the left side menu you can read about the faculty, peruse the curriculum of our one-year master’s degree program, apply online or download the application materials, and read the latest news about our students and alumni.  On the right, click on Scope to read the articles, hear the podcasts, and view the videos produced by our students over the course of their academic year with us.

Give it a try. If you run into any problems, let us know.  We welcome your comments.

Marcia Bartusiak, Executive Director

 

View all Comments | View full entry